From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 26 11:33:36 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F281816A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:33:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from av7-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av7-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net
	[81.228.10.110])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17ED43D49
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:33:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se)
Received: by av7-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id CEF3137E84; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:33:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net
	[81.228.10.180])
	by av7-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE96E37E83
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:33:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se
	[212.181.162.201])
	by smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CD4537E43
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:33:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 11751 invoked by uid 1001); 26 Jan 2005 11:33:33 -0000
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:33:33 +0100
From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>
To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20050126113332.GA11731@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>,
	Michael Sierchio <ducatista@camber-thrust.net>, ports@freebsd.org,
	Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>, lioux@freebsd.org
References: <41F6F431.6060005@tenebras.com>
	<1106704507.16118.14.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
	<41F72C02.7060901@camber-thrust.net>
	<20050126104355.GA3837@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
	<m3hdl4phni.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3hdl4phni.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
cc: ports@freebsd.org
cc: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
cc: Michael Sierchio <ducatista@camber-thrust.net>
cc: lioux@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: qmail-1.03_3
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:33:36 -0000

On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:13:37PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:34:58PM -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> >> ( 1 && 0 || 1 ) will ALWAYS evaluate to 1 on any ANSI C compiler.
> >
> > No, it will evaluate to 0.
> 
> It will evaluate to 1, as you're correctly stating...

Yes, right you are.  Sorry about that.

The interesting situation in this context seems to be ( 0 && 0 || 1)
which evaluates to 1 versus ( 0 && (0 || 1) which evaluates to 0.
Thereby demonstrating that the patch under discussion *does* change the
semantics - and probably for the better as far as I can tell.



-- 
<Insert your favourite quote here.>
Erik Trulsson
ertr1013@student.uu.se