From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 12 10:01:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9715516A4CE for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:01:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A8143D49 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:01:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1107.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7E96A1C0009B for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:01:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1107.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 636D01C00093 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:01:27 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050212100127407.636D01C00093@mwinf1107.wanadoo.fr Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:01:27 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1173315757.20050212110127@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1108182559.37129.44.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> References: <20050212025509.93CAD16A4CF@hub.freebsd.org> <1108182559.37129.44.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:01:28 -0000 Paul Mather writes: > The operating system is one thing; a certain level support is another. > That's Free/Open Source software for you. Yes. And it's one of the factors that makes the open-source movement highly self-limiting. I don't know of any way around it. But that's why I'd only recommend open-source solutions for mission-critical functions if an organization already has all the expertise it needs to support those solutions in-house and on site ... because if something goes down, that's the only serious support that will be available. In many situations, a limited level of support is tolerable, but not for key and mission-critical production use. -- Anthony