From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Dec 20 11:30:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA07104
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 11:30:13 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA07098;
          Sat, 20 Dec 1997 11:30:04 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA14813; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 11:29:47 -0800 (PST)
To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu, grog@lemis.com, julian@whistle.com,
        bde@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Bruce vandalism again 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 20 Dec 1997 13:45:47 EST."
             <199712201845.NAA00285@dyson.iquest.net> 
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 11:29:47 -0800
Message-ID: <14809.882646187@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> So we buck the trend of the Industry?  Many/most shops will blow your
> code away if it isn't ANSI.  (Imagine a design review:  Why didn't
> you (another person, not you JKH) declare and instantiate your functions
> correctly, and default to K&R.  Oh right, you are an old programmer, who
> grew up with K&R; well we don't do that anymore.)

You're still having the wrong argument.  This isn't about ANSI vs K&R.
If you want to go back over the thread and actually read it then I'll
be happy to debate it with you, but I refuse to be drawn into a
straw-man debate over an issue that wasn't even on the table until you
begin your inexplicable attempts to totally change the subject.

					Jordan