Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:30:08 -0400
From:      Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>
To:        Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: How to use u-boot-beaglebone port?
Message-ID:  <C9CD0919-10D4-4F7A-B90B-157762189DAD@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1426617259.62241.3.camel@freebsd.org>
References:  <17B779D7-2962-4455-9062-51411F316648@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <986F5E5D-C784-4BEF-81E3-49A9F27C0E8F@kientzle.com> <1426534773.95554.15.camel@freebsd.org> <F016BFCC-8CAA-4AE6-8142-40A9B69BD707@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <1426607993.25614.9.camel@freebsd.org> <F7EAB879-E70D-4ED5-8C5B-3B21FBED123A@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <1426617259.62241.3.camel@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 17, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 14:21 -0400, Paul Mather wrote:
>> On Mar 17, 2015, at 11:59 AM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>=20
>>> On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Mather wrote:
>>>> On Mar 16, 2015, at 3:39 PM, Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> On Sun, 2015-03-15 at 19:57 -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 5:59 PM, Paul Mather =
<paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Has anyone successfully used the sysutils/u-boot-beaglebone =
port?
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> I managed to build [1] and install it today.  I tried to install =
it to the SD card FAT partition, as per the README, and the result was =
an unbootable system.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> When I copied the u-boot.img file as u-boot.img (rather than the =
bb-uboot.img as suggested in the README), I got it to start up to the =
"U-Boot#" prompt.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Apparently, no one ever patched the port to use bb-uboot.img and =
bb-ubldr
>>>>>> as the name.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> I did this in Crochet when I was experimenting with having =
multiple
>>>>>> U-Boots on a single SD card image.  That experiment was to try
>>>>>> to see what would be required to build single images that booted =
on
>>>>>> multiple different devices.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>> When I created the u-boot-beaglebone port I specifically removed =
that
>>>>> bb- prefix stuff, because there will never be a unified image that =
runs
>>>>> on both rpi and beaglebone [*].  I had hoped someone would update
>>>>> crochet to use the new ports and this is one of the minor changes =
that
>>>>> would be needed on the crochet side.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> -- Ian
>>>>>=20
>>>>> [*] Because armv6 !=3D armv7 in this case.  While armv6 is =
synonymous with
>>>>> armv7 for most purposes in freebsd, the rpi is the exception to =
that in
>>>>> that it really IS armv6, and that leads to the kernel being built =
with
>>>>> different cache maintenance routines that don't work on armv7.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Does the sysutils/u-boot-beaglebone boot the BeagleBone Black for =
you?  As I reported earlier in the start to this thread, I can't get it =
to boot the system for me.
>>>>=20
>>>> I've copied MLO, u-boot.img, and /boot/ubldr to the FAT partition, =
but I just get to where U-Boot loads ubldr and then pauses before =
starting over again in a loop.
>>>>=20
>>>> Are there some other files that need to be copied to the FAT =
partition, or are those three files, plus the defaults compiled into =
u-boot.img sufficient to boot the BeagleBone Black from SD card?
>>>>=20
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>=20
>>>> Paul.
>>>=20
>>> Yep, it works for me on BBW and BBB.  The only time I've seen a =
totally
>>> silent lockup like that is when the loadaddr variable in the uboot =
env
>>> didn't match the UBLDR_LOADADDR value when ubldr was compiled.  For =
BB,
>>> those values are usually 0x88000000, iirc.  If you do a "readelf -a
>>> ubldr" on your build system you should see a line like
>>>=20
>>> Entry point address:               0x88000074
>>>=20
>>> and whatever it is should be your uboot loadaddr + 0x74.
>>=20
>> My current /boot/ubldr entry point address appears to be 0x1000074, =
which seems to be derived from the default set in =
/usr/src/sys/boot/arm/uboot/Makefile.
>>=20
>> What would I need to put in uEnv.txt to get such a ubldr to boot via =
the sysutils/u-boot-beaglebone port files?  Would I just need to have =
the single line "loadaddr=3D1000000" in uEnv.txt, or would I have to =
reproduce the whole environment embedded into u-boot.img?  (Do the =
settings in uEnv.txt replace entirely those in u-boot.img?)
>>=20
>>> You should only need MLO, u-boot.img, and ubldr on the fat =
partition.
>>> (There is an optional uEnv.txt that can be there, but it's not =
required
>>> to boot.)
>>=20
>> It looks like your supposition above is correct and a mis-matching =
loadaddr variable is likely to blame.
>>=20
>> Is a loadaddr of 0x1000000 correct for a BBB?
>>=20
>> Cheers,
>>=20
>> Paul.
>=20
> The address is a physical ram address, so you can't just make up any
> number -- there has to be actual ram at that address on the board, and
> the address must not conflict with where u-boot itself is loaded and
> where the kernel will be loaded.
>=20
> I think the BB ram starts at 0x80000000, so 0x10000000 won't work.  =
The
> right fix would be to recompile ubldr with UBLDR_LOADADDR set to
> 0x88000000.

What is the best place to set this?

My current /boot/ubldr is the product of a native build.  I looked =
through the source code and it seems the only place that sets this is =
/usr/src/sys/boot/arm/uboot/Makefile, where we have this:

	# Address at which ubldr will be loaded.
	# This varies for different boards and SOCs.
	UBLDR_LOADADDR?=3D        0x1000000


The "?=3D" makes me think this is just a fallback default to stop the =
build from breaking and that UBLDR_LOADADDR needs to be set accordingly =
for each different ARM system.  If that is so, and we know what the =
UBLDR_LOADADDR should be for the BBB (or at least that the default won't =
work because there's no RAM there on the BBB), then why doesn't -CURRENT =
set a value such that a working ubldr is built?  (I'd prefer ubldr not =
to be built at all than a non-working version be built.)

I presume I could set this in /etc/make.conf on my BBB.  Could I put it =
in my BBB kernel config file (which seems a good place for it)?

Many thanks for the help and information.  I plan to rebuild /boot/ubldr =
with a UBLDR_LOADADDR of 0x88000000.

Cheers,

Paul.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C9CD0919-10D4-4F7A-B90B-157762189DAD>