From owner-freebsd-security Fri Nov 20 06:07:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA06085 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 06:07:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from www.scancall.no (www.scancall.no [195.139.183.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA06080 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 06:07:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Marius.Bendiksen@scancall.no) Received: from super2.langesund.scancall.no [195.139.183.29] by www with smtp id KCZKAVGJ; Fri, 20 Nov 98 14:06:36 GMT (PowerWeb version 4.04r6) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19981120150634.009c1350@mail.scancall.no> X-Sender: Marius@mail.scancall.no X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 15:06:34 +0100 To: David Gilbert , Stefan `Sec` Zehl From: Marius Bendiksen Subject: Re: no more pty's / lockout Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <13908.55544.854706.2736@trooper.velocet.ca> References: <19981120003245.A5204@matrix.42.org> <19981120003245.A5204@matrix.42.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > ssh (and I believe rsh... but I don't use it) will allow a >login without an available tty as follows: That may be, but shouldn't we perhaps fix this in *our* telnetd as well? One of the major strengths of FreeBSD, IMO, is that it has the ability to run as a stable and secure system out of the box. --- Marius Bendiksen, IT-Trainee, ScanCall AS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message