From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 17 22:32: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95DE37B423; Thu, 17 May 2001 22:31:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f4I5VoI86453; Thu, 17 May 2001 22:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 22:31:50 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <200105180531.f4I5VoI86453@bunrab.catwhisker.org> To: david@catwhisker.org, dscheidt@tumbolia.com Subject: Re: background fsck Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, jhb@FreeBSD.ORG, mckusick@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 22:30:03 -0500 (CDT) >From: David Scheidt >Does tunefs update the alternate superblocks when it enables soft updates? >It doesn't look it does, but I might be missing something. I could easily have overlooked something myself, but it doesn't appear to do so to me. (I see it does want the file system clean when soft updates is enabled, but doesn't check for that for a disable request.) Cheers, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message