Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:17:54 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: Naram Qashat <cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: doxygen font error Message-ID: <4CDA5532.9000408@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <4CDA1279.4050809@cyberbotx.com> References: <4CD9CB8D.1070407@netfence.it> <4CDA1279.4050809@cyberbotx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/10/10 04:33, Naram Qashat wrote: >> First strangeness is that dot belongs to graphics/graphviz, but doxygen >> doesn't depend on that (seen with pkg_info and make >> pretty-print-run-depends-list). >> Is this my fault in any way? Is it a bug in the port? > > As the maintainer of the port, I can tell you that doxygen depends on > graphics/graphviz only if NOPORTDOCS is not defined. Did you have > NOPORTDOCS defined? If so, I might have to make it so graphviz is > required regardless. I don't see it in "make config" and I don't have it in /etc/make.conf either. > From a scan of the ports tree, there are many ports which have a > FreeSans.ttf as part of their pkg-plist. However, looking at the docs > that come with Doxygen, it appears that Doxygen itself should be > generating that file for use with dot. As I have only taken up > maintainership of the port and do not develop Doxygen, this may be > something to bring up with the Doxygen developers. A quick glance at the > code shows that it should be creating that, however. Ok. Should I file a bug report, a PR, whatever? Or should I just be patient and wait? :-) BTW, this is nothing critical to me. > Thanks, > Naram Qashat Thanks to you! bye av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CDA5532.9000408>