Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:24:56 -0400
From:      Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Brad Davis" <brd@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: network-dns
Message-ID:  <20080826082456.0efa48fc.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <35ffa5710808251916w439fc08fxc72870aed2372bf5@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <896438678.20080825194024@xablo.com> <20080825190946.25342442.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <35ffa5710808251916w439fc08fxc72870aed2372bf5@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:16:30 -0600
"Brad Davis" <brd@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:40:24 -0300
> > franco@xablo.com wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, on freebsd 7, the dns setted up on this page will not work
> >>
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-dns.html
> >>
> >> because there is needed to comment a default line which does not
> >> allow foreign querys (only allow localhost at 127.0.0.1)
> >>
> >> Also, the ftp configuration there
> >>
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-ftp.html
> >>
> >> is not working on freebsd 7.  following the steps you will never get
> >> connected at
> >>
> >> % ftp localhost
> >>
> >> Let me know.
> >
> > It would be neat if we could have some kind of implemented
> > "known handbook issues" which is completely separate from the
> > various PR listings in gnats.  I'm sure that some data
> > easily becomes stale, and there are probably sections which
> > require written still.
> >
> > But now I'm probably bleeding into more of an unreasonable
> > area since we could probably just grep through the doc PRs
> > and find some of the stale data listed.
> 
> I was just thinking we should put a chart on the wiki with all the
> different sections and date/name. So we could have
> committers/volunteers can say I have gone through section X and
> verified the directions are valid against $LATEST_RELEASE_X and
> $LATEST_RELEASE_Y.
> 
> Anyone think there would be any validity to setting this up?

I dig this.  At one time we had a "todo" list for the print
copy.  The wiki is probably a better version.  ;)

-- 
Tom Rhodes



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080826082456.0efa48fc.trhodes>