From owner-svn-src-stable@freebsd.org Fri May 18 16:26:20 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C38BEAD9A0 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 16:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B02B7D7A6 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 16:26:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id q4-v6so13851483ite.3 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 09:26:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=JUB6Y+uP4y0Y0xmKC70IcBGn1ghU8bG0L/5NBcoOSno=; b=iycna/flxR9/5K/vP8VRVXuDpXockYbEmh2vh9k9HtmhoYbTvjWi4Qzh89WbSxQoAW df5dPiC5wp1pJCW8yv4mThK03N7ZoHJ1kBYgMqVx5D3N0DzCWnZfmPdhWryyGsc69/3k RixTngRx06hqdRA+6HOHeKAWtjfoZTL0AjzrXWoGNL02l8d7SIR3cof+UrOO2z3IHX11 swlFAYva6ArYR24HBoWTB9guwYVnuTQfhe+R6rFpCITmSWGfFGYC7FVdlhD4i94PY9qk sEFziX51Mo+d4+dYpTDxLMuCi9j7au2uBq30VmNUcpp2kWWKvecbVBKRvsK6/3vcPn4g 9MAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JUB6Y+uP4y0Y0xmKC70IcBGn1ghU8bG0L/5NBcoOSno=; b=FKptZEUXndcIk5r9p387aWZX341AqeJMwl7aW104+MJNTVb1Wf35Q6yoSJl9O48RNE afauC560dZcLNDv/WXh4YMzo6b4h5CO2zxEJbOpmSIfr5uBDSrvXtrtEHUFLCPAE6lty eEszkX2gy4KGEskgEwPhnleu0PRdaTxS3hZAP7HOASrcMia4B5yWn+7LHNYjT3dBgOI/ vJ+hjgv3WMWlbfvkkh44PDqNpu1hZg4u3bucirDAkXUIKXRQS1BSSmPYbFPo0dkdKqcL V/tbfcomSZXvjjw3XLFZV2GIgGNiMWT1eA3Be3vjZzywq/+GRpstcTuU1eJHjMs5lfi1 6Quw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwd+zf0UzbrnQt/POYSZqADSdiFkb7arzrucZCqqj1w0mxJruXhQ uCdmRj36XxNrfibLZwFz/o9dNEoLgzwDFS5PV8h3HQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrf0VEOHmW4TtSOWtDaTiFRjwOqwXzGGNbX48ylTZH4mKyAknNNj8QJev1lspu2ihNMhqPqd1eGwBe/x7JVUJ4= X-Received: by 2002:a24:6ec1:: with SMTP id w184-v6mr7472497itc.57.1526660778469; Fri, 18 May 2018 09:26:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: wlosh@bsdimp.com Received: by 2002:a4f:a649:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 18 May 2018 09:26:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [50.253.99.174] In-Reply-To: <201805181435.w4IEZSIQ011245@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> References: <20180518141752.GA6250@bali> <201805181435.w4IEZSIQ011245@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> From: Warner Losh Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 10:26:17 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: oWcLgSdKgp1UzZKcgUSsBWzrbRg Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r333673 - in stable/11/etc: etc.aarch64 etc.amd64 etc.arm etc.i386 etc.powerpc etc.riscv etc.sparc64 To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: Andre Albsmeier , Warner Losh , src-committers , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.26 X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 16:26:20 -0000 On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:35 AM, Rodney W. Grimes < freebsd@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 16-May-2018 at 13:18:38 +0000, Warner Losh wrote: > > > Author: imp > > > Date: Wed May 16 13:18:37 2018 > > > New Revision: 333673 > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/333673 > > > > > > Log: > > > MFC r333436: only launch getty if underlying device exists > > > > Can the onifexists thing work under 11? I had problems > > with my ttys until I switched back to "on". I also can't > > find an MFC of r315733 which apparently implemented this > > in HEAD... > > This has been caught during the Beta2 build and corrective > actions are in process. > > The pointy hat belongs to me, as I asked imp to merge this, > thinking that all the other parts had been merged as I did > not get an error when I put onifexists in my 11-beta1 /etc/ttys, > but was getting lots of noise from getty about attempts to > start ttys on v1-v7 without this. > Should I un-merge this or merge the init code? I just checked the VM I tested against, and it was my -current VM, no the -stable one that I thought :( Or do you have it under control? Warner