From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 7 14:33:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA19225 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 14:33:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports) Received: from word.smith.net.au (ppp8.portal.net.au [202.12.71.108]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA19205 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 14:32:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA02384 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 00:32:49 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199801071402.AAA02384@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: bsd.port.mk broken on -current Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 08 Jan 1998 00:32:48 +1030 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Was the recent breaking of bsd.port.mk on current (the Tcl detection stuff) accidental or deliberate? Is there any intention to perhaps improve the intelligence of the detection slightly to differentiate between Tcl installed as part of the system and Tcl as a truly outdated port? "/usr/*/*tcl*" hits /usr/bin/tclsh, which is a standard -current system component. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\