From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 6 15:32:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8289E1065672; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:32:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout5.freenet.de (mout5.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8AF8FC16; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.14] (helo=4.mx.freenet.de) by mout5.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.70 #1) id 1NSXrz-0000Yh-S9; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:32:23 +0100 Received: from [87.174.37.71] (port=38695 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 4.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #94) id 1NSXrz-000073-Ip; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:32:23 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:31:48 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20100106163148.16247015@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <4B43C0F1.1060404@FreeBSD.org> References: <20100105200347.GA83318@cons.org> <4B43B621.6070600@FreeBSD.org> <20100105222134.GA18040@cons.org> <4B43C0F1.1060404@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Martin Cracauer , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:32:25 -0000 On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:45:05 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > Martin Cracauer wrote: > > RELENG_8 will lift be out of binary ports, at least as far as > > portupgrade is concerned. > > Sorry, I don't understand that sentence. > I would guess this should read "will be left out of..." Follows logically from his concern that there are no binary packages for -STABLE. --- Gary Jennejohn