From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov  4 00:45:58 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 43C0816A4DC; Tue,  4 Nov 2003 00:45:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CF18843FDF; Tue,  4 Nov 2003 00:45:56 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA48jtM8039998;
	Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:45:55 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 04 Nov 2003 02:26:24 CST."
             <20031104022403.J625@odysseus.silby.com> 
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:45:55 +0100
Message-ID: <39997.1067935555@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_timeout.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 08:45:58 -0000

In message <20031104022403.J625@odysseus.silby.com>, Mike Silbersack writes:
>
>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Kirk McKusick wrote:
>
>> mckusick    2003/11/04 00:03:11 PST
>>
>>   FreeBSD src repository
>>
>>   Modified files:
>>     sys/kern             kern_timeout.c
>>   Log:
>>   Get rid of DIAGNOSTIC that gives false positives on slow CPUs.
>
>That doesn't seem to be a very good reason for removing the code.  As only
>the highest value seen so far is printed, the code is generally pretty
>quiet once it stops complaining about how long the MII routines take.

I agree, I am unhappy about this removal too.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.