From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 6 11:58:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5DA37B401 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 11:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w250.z064001178.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net (adsl-66.218.45.239.dslextreme.com [66.218.45.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B906143FBD for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 11:58:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jos@catnook.com) Received: (qmail 25799 invoked by uid 1000); 6 Jun 2003 18:58:48 -0000 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 11:58:26 -0700 From: Jos Backus To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030606185848.GB19583@lizzy.catnook.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org References: <20030605235254.W5414@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030606175954.GQ65470@perrin.int.nxad.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030606175954.GQ65470@perrin.int.nxad.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: Way forward with BIND 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jos@catnook.com List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 18:58:27 -0000 On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:59:54AM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote: > Ummm... I hate to beg the question, but why have a nameserver in the > default installation? All we need is the client resolver libraries > and basic CLI programs. I agree. Sean makes some very good points here. -- Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Sunnyvale, CA _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ jos at catnook.com _/_/ _/_/_/ require 'std/disclaimer'