From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 20 09:26:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5195F1065673; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:26:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@exonetric.com) Received: from relay.exonetric.net (relay0.exonetric.net [178.250.72.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153178FC08; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.111.191] (unknown [62.244.179.74]) by relay.exonetric.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F2DA2C68C; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:16:57 +0100 (BST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1485\)) From: Mark Blackman In-Reply-To: <5031FF67.80000@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:16:57 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <5031FAAB.9020409@FreeBSD.org> <5031FF67.80000@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1485) Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:26:52 -0000 On 20 Aug 2012, at 10:12, Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/20/2012 01:55, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> We will continue to reject this until there are more firm plans, >> proper documentation on the security support side, which I cannot >> remember Simon got an answer for. > > I gave a clear answer. If there are any pieces missing it's up to Simon > to follow up with Dag-Erling. >> I continue to say that I am not willing to trade one for another >> for the sake of just changing the name. > > Have you seriously not been paying attention to the numerous reasons why > BIND in the base is no longer a good fit? Perhaps bunging together a quick wiki-page to point busier individuals at would be handy? - Mark