Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:16:57 +0100 From: Mark Blackman <mark@exonetric.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound Message-ID: <CDC9FFBF-9BD8-4633-AE2C-688DD6690DC7@exonetric.com> In-Reply-To: <5031FF67.80000@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAL409Kzjjaur5%2B1gGh7VtTdg5M1zjLpZ-kmm8%2BrWv%2Bw9ua%2B14A@mail.gmail.com> <5031FAAB.9020409@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208200852420.78446@ai.fobar.qr> <5031FF67.80000@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 Aug 2012, at 10:12, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On 08/20/2012 01:55, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> We will continue to reject this until there are more firm plans, >> proper documentation on the security support side, which I cannot >> remember Simon got an answer for. > > I gave a clear answer. If there are any pieces missing it's up to Simon > to follow up with Dag-Erling. >> I continue to say that I am not willing to trade one for another >> for the sake of just changing the name. > > Have you seriously not been paying attention to the numerous reasons why > BIND in the base is no longer a good fit? Perhaps bunging together a quick wiki-page to point busier individuals at would be handy? - Mark
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CDC9FFBF-9BD8-4633-AE2C-688DD6690DC7>