From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org  Sat Feb 24 22:09:02 2018
Return-Path: <owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F7CF274FE;
 Sat, 24 Feb 2018 22:09:02 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@freebsd.org)
Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [78.47.246.247])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBC3A7A2A1;
 Sat, 24 Feb 2018 22:09:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@freebsd.org)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be
 forged))
 by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w1OM8rwP029775
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
 Sat, 24 Feb 2018 23:08:54 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from eugen@freebsd.org)
X-Envelope-From: eugen@freebsd.org
X-Envelope-To: rgrimes@freebsd.org
Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4])
 by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w1OM8nUG010355
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
 Sun, 25 Feb 2018 05:08:49 +0700 (+07)
 (envelope-from eugen@freebsd.org)
Subject: Re: svn commit: r329930 - head/sbin/route
To: rgrimes@freebsd.org
References: <201802242156.w1OLu1gT002675@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org,
 svn-src-head@freebsd.org
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <5A91E26C.40808@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 05:08:44 +0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201802242156.w1OLu1gT002675@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,
 SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Spam-Report: * 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record
 (softfail)
 * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 *      [score: 0.0000]
 *  1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net
X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for &quot;
 user&quot; and &quot; projects&quot; \)" <svn-src-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-src-all>,
 <mailto:svn-src-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-src-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-src-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all>,
 <mailto:svn-src-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 22:09:02 -0000

25.02.2018 4:56, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:

> That pretty much defeats the purpose of a PINNED route if by default
> route delete is going to delete them.

Not exactly. According to rtentry(9):

           RTF_PINNED         Indicates that this route is immutable to a
                              routing protocol.

That is, routing daemons should not be allowed to modify such route
but /sbin/route is system administrator's tool, not routing protocol one.

It should be able to remove any route that it could before "pinned" changes. Hence, this commit.