From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 17:02:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7DF16A407; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BA643D99; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:02:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [172.21.130.86] (mx-broadway [38.98.68.18]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8QH2kB7084419 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:02:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: Andrey Chernov Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:02:40 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200609202304.25537@aldan> <20060921154412.GA59729@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060921154412.GA59729@nagual.pp.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609261302.40964.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1946/Tue Sep 26 09:18:37 2006 on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:23:21 +0000 Cc: current@freebsd.org, tjr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: replacing FreeBSD's -lgnuregex with GNUlib's version X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:02:58 -0000 Any news on this? -mi четвер 21 вересень 2006 11:44, Andrey Chernov написав: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:04:24PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > A recent discussion on the gm4 and gnulib mailing lists over the merits > > of gm4's bundling of its own regex implementation has produced the > > suggestion, that we replace our src/gnu/lib/libregex (which is currently > > obtained from fedora-glibc-2_3_4-21) with gnulib's implementation. > > > > The latter is claimed to be more actively maintained and with more bug > > fixes, than glibc people have managed to incorporate. > > > > Does anyone have a strong preference for fedora/glibc implementation > > currently in use, or should we follow this advice (source -- regex' > > maintainer for gnulib -- CC-ed) and switch over? > > Please point to gnulib's regex sources to compare with.