Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:31:12 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, simon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD doc packages - docs/71153 Message-ID: <4304C5E0.9040706@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20050819.021029.95818809.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <20050612170112.GT821@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20050819.021029.95818809.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> si> So, is there really a point in keeping doc packages around? I don't
> si> really think they are that interesting and they in account for a large
> si> part of doc/ on the FTP mirrors.
>
> I guess few people know about the doc packages and/or most of people
> read the docs online only...
I am perfectly happy with the doc packages going away. If someone wants to
work on or follow docs, using CVS/CVSup works just fine.
-----
What do people think about:
ln -s /usr/share/doc /usr/local/www/data/doc
(s/data/data-dist, if you like)
...I try to set that up locally on anything that runs a webserver, just for the
sake of having it locally, but maybe that would be a good idea in general?
Either put something similar to http://www.freebsd.org/docs.html as
/usr/share/doc/index.html, or perhaps even update the index.html.XX files
already in www/data-dist to include a reference to localized FreeBSD docs.
--
-Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4304C5E0.9040706>