From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 15 23:33:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B42F16A409 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:33:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04A013C4A7 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1FMvfIO045851; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:57:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l1FMvec8045848; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:57:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:57:40 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob To: "Justin T. Gibbs" In-Reply-To: <45A9225D.4080907@scsiguy.com> Message-ID: <20070215145657.N45611@ns1.feral.com> References: <20070104225519.Q92958@ns1.feral.com> <459E8AE7.90104@samsco.org> <20070105093930.Y34456@ns1.feral.com> <459E97E6.4000603@samsco.org> <459E989C.2020602@samsco.org> <20070105103431.A34456@ns1.feral.com> <20070105104021.D34456@ns1.feral.com> <45A9225D.4080907@scsiguy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, mjacob@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CAM rescanner thread? X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthew Jacob List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:33:18 -0000 Following up from this, belatedly, I see lots of good stuff, and: > With the discovery process moved to a > thread and some augmentation to XPT_SCAN_*, we should be good enough > for now. So, in principle a thread for rescanning seems appropriate to you? -matt