From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 18 14:50:30 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63412C1
 for <freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:50:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DEF5895
 for <freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:50:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3IEoU9j051072
 for <freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:50:30 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 199084] [PATCH] Support POGOPLUG V4 / 88F6192
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:50:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: arm
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: jeditekunum@gmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-199084-7-fuGRBKoVvs@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-199084-7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-199084-7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:50:30 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199084

--- Comment #1 from jeditekunum@gmail.com ---
Linux identifies as 88F6281 but the TCLK is correct.

Apparently the sample-at-reset register has a bit that indicates the correct
TCLK. (based on several sources including
https://stuff.mit.edu/afs/sipb/contrib/linux/drivers/clk/mvebu/kirkwood.c)

So a better fix would probably be to ignore the fact that it is really a 6192
and just set TCLK based on that.

I also came across more recent Linux changes to use DT:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2014-June/019535.html

As a noob to Freebsd kernel changes, I'm not in a position to determine what is
the right way to fix this. Nor do I have a 6281 device to test any changes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.