From owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 6 14:42:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0809F16A4DE for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 14:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james@wgold.demon.co.uk) Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C5543D45 for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 14:42:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james@wgold.demon.co.uk) Received: from wgold.demon.co.uk ([158.152.96.124] helo=thor) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1G9jq4-000Ipc-5u; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:42:49 +0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by thor ([127.0.0.1] running VPOP3) with SMTP; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 15:43:38 +0100 From: "James Mansion" To: "Vladimir Botka" Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 15:43:36 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20060806081824.M65597@srv.g1.netng.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Importance: Normal X-Server: VPOP3 V1.5.0k - Registered Cc: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Subject: RE: diskless (or rather, readonly) X-BeenThere: freebsd-small@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:42:51 -0000 Thanks Vlidimir. > I think rc.diskless2 (and rc.diskless1 ) is 5.X related. I have to say, one of the things one hears about FreeBSD by proponents is that the quality of documentation is supposed to be better than linux. But it is depressing that when you read the documentation, you then have to try and work out whether it applies to 4.x, 5.x or is actually in any way related to current 6.x systems. I have a diskless unionfs-based setup for Linux, but I was hoping to try FreeBSd precisely so I could use a supported setup. I've seen all those links before and none of them focus on a compact-flash install, nearly all of it relates to the dhcp/bootp/nfs stuff. :-( James