From owner-freebsd-security Thu Sep 23 0:59:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [204.188.6.238]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C472C159C6 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:59:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from unfurl@magnesium.net) Received: (qmail 53249 invoked by uid 1001); 23 Sep 1999 07:59:52 -0000 Date: 23 Sep 1999 00:59:52 -0700 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:59:52 -0700 From: Bill Swingle To: Wes Peters Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory Message-ID: <19990923005952.A53094@dub.net> References: <199909210214.UAA22243@harmony.village.org> <37E9BDF5.8B324775@softweyr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre1i In-Reply-To: <37E9BDF5.8B324775@softweyr.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 11:43:17PM -0600, Wes Peters wrote: > I never got enough discussion, nor an answer from Mr. Security Officer, Sir. > Should we be publishing the SAs, or at least references to them, on > daily.daemonnews.org? Do we feel the security and announce mailing list > is enough? > > I'm willing to post the FreeBSD ones if we mostly agree this is a good idea. I'm all in favor of it. The SA make it to Bugtraq almost immediatly after Mr. Security Officer send them out to the FreeBSD lists. IMHO, the wider distributed they are the better. -Bill -- -=| --- B i l l S w i n g l e --- http://www.dub.net/ -=| unfurl@dub.net - unfurl@freebsd.org - bill@cdrom.com -=| Different all twisty a of in maze are you, passages little To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message