From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Sep 25 18:29:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhub.state.me.us (mailhub.state.me.us [141.114.122.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94C137B40C for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from katahdin.bmv.state.me.us by mailhub.state.me.us with ESMTP for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:24:12 -0400 Received: from localhost (darren@localhost) by katahdin.bmv.state.me.us (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) with ESMTP id VAA14288 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:29:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:29:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Darren Henderson To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.4 arp problem In-Reply-To: Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, geesh, one of thoe days... I still had a mistake in the routing info. Apologies for the reposts.... On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Darren Henderson wrote: > > NOTE: I goofed when I put out this question, trying to obscure the addresses > a bit I picked a range that wasn't representative of the values in actual > use. The result was that address ranges were incorrect. They are correct > below. > > I upgraded a system from 4.3-STABLE to 4.4-STABLE using cvs on 9/23. > > Everything was fine before the upgrade, upgrade went smoothly with the > exeption of the MAKEDEV problem thats been reported on the list recently. > > This is a dual homed box (multi homed actually but only two interfaces are > in the kernel and active). Typical set up with ipfw/natd. > > The system is apparently running just fine. However, I am seeing "/kernel: > arp_rtrequest: bad gateway value" messages which were never there before. > Anyone have an idea what may be causing them? > > Searching the archives and the web turns up precious little. This is > apparently generated in netinet/if_ether and relates to aliases. I do have > several aliases defined on one interface. They are configured in > /etc/rc.conf as (x.y.z being numeric of course) ... > > ifconfig_dc0="inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_dc1="inet x.y.z.162 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_dc1_alias0="inet x.y.z.163 netmask 255.255.255.255" > ifconfig_dc1_alias1="inet x.y.z.166 netmask 255.255.255.255" > ifconfig_dc1_alias2="inet x.y.z.174 netmask 255.255.255.255" > gateway_enable="YES" > router_enable="YES" > defaultrouter="x.y.z.161" > > And from netstat -rn we see (in part, lo0 & dc0 routes excluded).... > > default x.y.z.161 UGSc 29 541559 dc1 > x.y.z.160/28 link#2 UC 2 0 dc1 > x.y.z.161 (nic of gateway) UHLW 3 0 dc1 1183 > x.y.z.163 x.y.z.163 UHLW 0 4 lo0 => > x.y.z.163/32 link#2 UC 1 0 dc1 > x.y.z.166 x.y.z.166 UHLW 0 10 lo0 => > x.y.z.166/32 link#2 UC 1 0 dc1 > x.y.z.174 (nic of link#2) UHLW 0 6 lo0 => > x.y.z.174/32 link#2 UC 0 0 dc1 > > I believe 174 looks different then 163 and 166 becuase those two addresses > are redirected via ipfw/natd to internal addresses. > > Something changed in the way interface aliases are handled? Am I looking at > the wrong things? Any thoughts appreciated. > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Darren Henderson darren@bmv.state.me.us > darren.henderson@state.me.us > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > ________________________________________________________________________ Darren Henderson darren@bmv.state.me.us darren.henderson@state.me.us To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message