Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:28:54 +0800
From:      blubee blubeeme <gurenchan@gmail.com>
To:        Dave B <g8kbvdave@googlemail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Speculation & meldown. Nothing new!
Message-ID:  <CALM2mEng5_E29SoTYRR8pc=m=sKZvNrcv_yJFh6pUy%2B=0BCb4w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <76499e59-497e-bb96-7adc-4484da8197d4@googlemail.com>
References:  <mailman.86.1516104007.66743.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <76499e59-497e-bb96-7adc-4484da8197d4@googlemail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 9:17 PM, Dave B via freebsd-questions <
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Here you go.  From SN show notes for episode 645, aired last week.
>
> From:-  https://www.grc.com/sn/sn-645-notes.pdf   Page 12 of 13.
>
>
> WhatWhat's Old is New Again...
> 1995: "The Intel 80x86 Processor Architecture: Pitfalls for Secure
> Systems."
> https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2209/42809262c17b6631c0f6536c91aaf7
> 756857.pdf
> 1995: on page 9 under section "4.2 Security Flaws": Item 6. Prefetching
> may fetch otherwise
> inaccessible instructions in Virtual 8086 mode. (From a paper in 1992!)
> -- 25 years ago.
>
>
> Enjoy.
>
> Dave B.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-
> unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Yea but look at those single core performance speeds!

/s
How does performance stack up now when valid security practices are applied?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALM2mEng5_E29SoTYRR8pc=m=sKZvNrcv_yJFh6pUy%2B=0BCb4w>