From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Apr 24 15:59:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA07243
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 15:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ki.net (root@ki.net [205.150.102.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA07238
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 15:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freebsd.ki.net (root@freebsd.ki.net [205.150.102.51]) by ki.net (8.7.4/8.7.4) with ESMTP id SAA06693; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 18:59:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by freebsd.ki.net (8.7.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id SAA02033; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 18:59:09 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd.ki.net: scrappy owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 18:59:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>
To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, cat@ki.net,
        geoff@ki.net
Subject: Re: MotherBoard Jumper Settings...
In-Reply-To: <199604240912.CAA04144@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.93.960424185832.1276B-100000@freebsd.ki.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 24 Apr 1996, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:

> > > 	The jumpers for the cache are set for 256KB/64kbx4...how do I
> > > determine the size of each of the cache chips to determine if *this* is
> > > right?
> > 
> > The 61512 suggests a 512 Kbit cache.  Seems you are using only half of
> > it with your jumper setting.
> 
> The 61512 is infact a 64k x 8 part, I looked it up as there had been
> too much speculation on here about just what that chip was.  Cache RAM
> on 486 and later machines is almost always x 8 parts for those who thought
> this might have been a 128k x 4.
> 
> Your cache jumper settings are correct at 256K/64Kx8.  You may still have
> a bad cache RAM though.  Do you ever get any signal 10's or 11's from the
> gcc compiler, or do you just get panics?
>
	Forget my last to Michael then...I won't change this :)

	But since you did look it up...20 or 15ns? :)

Marc G. Fournier                                  scrappy@ki.net
Systems Administrator @ ki.net               scrappy@freebsd.org