From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 8 17:52:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090501065672 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16468FC14 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ml4ra-0004pK-VK for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:52:18 -0700 Message-ID: <25351048.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:52:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20090905150537.GA78983@cuba.calyx.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl References: <20090905150537.GA78983@cuba.calyx.nl> Subject: Re: v9.0 treating me very well X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:52:20 -0000 Bill Squire {billsf} wrote: > > > Hi current-users, > > Surely we want v8.0 to work right, but many of the complaints I see have > already been fixed in v9.0 Its not my call (no way will use a Generic > kernel) > but please consider your configurations carefully. If you want to do both > you > need a separate base install and a /var. I put multiple base-installs on > flash ROM drives. Be sure they don't 'require MSDOSFS' to work, but be > prepared > to put it back and take it back. (see the ports or emulate, also in the > ports) > Hint: 2GiB drives made by a manufacturer I've taken many larger ones back > so > I refuse to advertise then, particularly since they have discontinued that > model. Hint: Its a place close to namesake of this server I'm using. > > PS: The low-cost (and best sounding) USB chips work out of the box, now on > v9.0 so if you have these try it out. I use balanced audio and have really > decent speakers -- You know if you read my previous posts. > > Bill Squire > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Hello.. Maybe I should not reply, but curiosity got the better of me... What were you trying to communicate? What is the main thought beneath phrasing? >Surely we want v8.0 to work right, but many of the complaints I see have >already been fixed in v9.0 This is why we have MFC, and CURRENT in managed in somehow close state to STABLE prior to RELEASE. >Its not my call (no way will use a Generic kernel) ? (I fail to see connection.) >I put multiple base-installs on >flash ROM drives. You see flash drives as EEPROM, ok but I again fail to see connection. >PS: The low-cost (and best sounding) USB chips work out of the box, now on >v9.0 so if you have these try it out. Something changed after branching 8-STABLE from 8-CURRENT? I doubt it. Ariff work is nonetheless excellent. >I refuse to advertise then, particularly since they have discontinued that >model. Hint: Its a place close to namesake of this server I'm using. Why such choose of words? You want to recommend something or rather not? >I use balanced audio and have really >decent speakers -- You know if you read my previous posts It's nice to have nice speakers. -best regards, Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/v9.0-treating-me-very-well-tp25309347p25351048.html Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.