Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Jun 2015 09:30:02 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: CFT/CFR: NUMA policy branch
Message-ID:  <BE4C0F16-31A4-4B27-972A-8C722E44266B@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=y76JzK1RPdFy5bf%2B1x188emWq1%2BKe3xqDVJnDDyV=eA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAJ-Vmo=SnqXTF5m65haKqrVf699zinyXs%2BQdvR6V88CW7vooCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=y76JzK1RPdFy5bf%2B1x188emWq1%2BKe3xqDVJnDDyV=eA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Apple-Mail=_310781A9-6E52-422A-8E2D-49BB687AD9CA
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

Hi Adrian,

How does this work release to the branch that Jeff Roberson had for =
numaizing
the VM system? Can any of that work be carried forward?

Warner


> On May 31, 2015, at 9:47 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> It's in a review, and I've addressed most of the feedback:
>=20
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559
>=20
> I'd like to get more feedback before I commit this. I'm hoping to
> commit it next week so I can make a start on pushing numa awareness
> into KVA allocation and contigmalloc/busdma.
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -adrian
>=20
>=20
> On 12 May 2015 at 18:32, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>=20
>> I'm at the point now where I think this part is done and I'd like to
>> get it more formally reviewed and ready for commit into -HEAD.
>>=20
>> Here's the branch:
>>=20
>> =
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/compare/master...erikarn:local/adrian_n=
uma_policy
>>=20
>> * added syscalls;
>> * added vm domain policy and iterators;
>> * per-process, per-thread and global system policy;
>> * added numactl - a tool to manipulate, fetch and start processes w/ =
policies;;
>> * added manpages for everything above.
>>=20
>> It's working fine for a handful of people who have been testing it.
>> I'd like to get some more wider testing and reporting.
>>=20
>> I'd like to wrap this up in a formal phabricator review in the next
>> few days and kick start it along.
>>=20
>> Thanks!
>>=20
>>=20
>> -adrian
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to =
"freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


--Apple-Mail=_310781A9-6E52-422A-8E2D-49BB687AD9CA
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVbHp6AAoJEGwc0Sh9sBEAf5kP/jbuVufgiTCE28eNC6IaVrTG
TLMufgFoSN4/D8SejsEWiHrVn6hcxX+bbM4tqtvFp92fHMTxM4lDFHrmiyCknvR6
AtQcrvWGV5dXjoTHGy6hNIoyC5E4XPMSs8YHg/sPyOW9q1ZlCau4uxr66TNr7OBw
lxxs3yI2P/Y2kgjlA+4JlmnI+RSyF8pAmLMROqaC5lNwAZ5ynZqGNL14jHpsox1T
2BdlhwyLU3W43gvPFKF+258nXbn+ENvGXOAFJ4kwB1Zxr8MaGH8cAFqjmphLuHqT
8rhkYDGUo6r0At/OHWrmDlj+ybjFB3JGFs4+mNQwV+vUNtvX4dOsev30pgdV7tuN
dmr21Y18xGj7NX3HJiaJoRXIolPtmab/E94ROIg4C7zUbw2sU3MmNW273z3/GCGH
w1DfHh0W1yU6ldcdNt/I/WbA9gkAREuE5F4ZT78Mc6ebuaKdom4LPnm3xTnc4gdA
1ivXjojw71946SpcK1kCsM4/OOzXME3pLZpZxW8Wv+Etca4HgAHsU2utyas3FLFW
yLrgeIJpoo5VNaHjrEDZiTFuF0d2W/073YXP1och1yQNoSBagY79cCO58V1Oklk4
y4NIs1i4OAKw7vL5fi7w587UK6NKB2b0DSC/K2Jk5HDRUYVbZfxgsM6QiQyxQ+5+
rcvLLR5tStv1+qBNnSfc
=7yz5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_310781A9-6E52-422A-8E2D-49BB687AD9CA--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BE4C0F16-31A4-4B27-972A-8C722E44266B>