From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jun  7 04:51:18 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA08745
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 7 Jun 1996 04:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA08725;
          Fri, 7 Jun 1996 04:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA02059; Fri, 7 Jun 1996 04:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Richard Wackerbarth" <rkw@dataplex.net>
cc: "FreeBSD Hackers" <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>,
        "p.richards@elsevier.co.uk" <p.richards@elsevier.co.uk>,
        "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Re(2): The demise of -stable 
In-reply-to: Your message of "07 Jun 1996 06:31:09 CDT."
             <n1377993411.88252@Richard Wackerbarth> 
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 1996 04:51:08 -0700
Message-ID: <2056.834148268@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Unlike Jordan, I would encourage, but not require, developers to contribute
> additions such as new device drivers. Such additions would extend the viable

Well, let's not get ahead of ourselves - there are a lot of issues to
deal with before the question of branch commit philosophy even raises
its head.

We're also not bearing in mind that _anything_ which involves the CVS tree
is going to involve the repository meister, and AFAIK nobody has gotten
his vote on all of this yet. :-)

					Jordan