From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Mar 23 12:29:59 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA20091 for current-outgoing; Thu, 23 Mar 1995 12:29:59 -0800
Received: from LOCALHOST (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA20084; Thu, 23 Mar 1995 12:29:58 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host LOCALHOST didn't use HELO protocol
To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu>
cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>, bde@zeta.org.au,
        me@tartufo.pcs.dec.com, nate@trout.sri.mt.net, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Make World Times and a question about shared libs / make all 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Mar 95 12:26:50 EST."
             <Pine.SUN.3.91.950323122150.12200B-100000@cappuccino.eng.umd.edu> 
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 1995 12:29:57 -0800
Message-ID: <20081.795990597@freefall.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I think you misunderstood (or I did you)... I'm speaking of folks who 
> would never consider making any part of the tree themselves, but just 
> would like to be able to do a little light level c hacking on their more 
> limited machine budgets.  Jordan spoke of making /usr/include completely 
> links to parts of usr/src.  I am wondering what effect that would have on 
> folks who don't even have a /usr/src.  Will this mean that such folks 
> will have to carry around at least parts of the /usr/src tree, in order 
> to have the /usr/include [reasonably] complete?

No.  The installation would do a `make install shared=copies' so
/usr/include would be ONLY files on a fresh from-bindist installation.
This is the way it is now, in fact, or no one would be able to compile
*anything* without a source dist! :-)

					Jordan