From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Nov 14 09:26:44 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id JAA24027
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 09:26:44 -0800
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA24002
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 09:26:35 -0800
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA20209; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 10:19:38 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199511141719.KAA20209@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: ISP state their FreeBSD concerns
To: davidg@root.com
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 10:19:38 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, hsu@cs.hut.fi, current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199511141707.JAA00421@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Nov 14, 95 09:07:15 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 553       
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> >Sequencer code written in the face of manufacturer opposition simply
> >does not give me the warm fuzzies (no slight on the Adaptec driver
> >intended -- though if you want to view it as a slight on Adaptec, feel
> >free to do so 8-)).
> 
>    Adaptec does not oppose us providing our own sequencer code.

No, they oppose us.  Or we could use their sequencer code and (potentially)
not have problems like this.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.