From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 21 11:59:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD7C37C060 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:59:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA46570; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:57:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id MAA82369; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:56:00 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200006211856.MAA82369@harmony.village.org> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP development Cc: Robert Withrow , Poul-Henning Kamp , Brian Somers , Matthew Dillon , Jason Evans , current@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:45:48 PDT." <12213.961613148@localhost> References: <12213.961613148@localhost> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:56:00 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <12213.961613148@localhost> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: : Everyone talks about using bitkeeper but none of the people who : recommend it have ever actually tried to use it for anything. : Before such recommendations will bear weight, this needs to : change. :) In that case, I'd recommend perforce :-) I used it extensively at Pluto while I was there. I'd love to see FreeBSD use it. The non-open source ness of it is a bummer, but how much pain are we willing to tolerate for our ideals? :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message