From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Sep 26 9:27: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (mcut-b-167.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.209.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1C637B422; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 09:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3D10518F8; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 11:27:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 11:27:14 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Maxim Sobolev , Satoshi Asami Subject: Porters Handbook policy Message-ID: <20000926112714.D30130@puck.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , ports@FreeBSD.org, Maxim Sobolev , Satoshi Asami Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ok guys, as Maxim insisted. I say change the Porters Handbook such that it only requires a patchfile to be prefixed with "patch-". Recommend that the patchfile's name resemble in one form or another the actual file being patched, but don't impose restrictions on what it should be. Deal? Good. Now can we get on with life. *shaking head* -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB++++$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w--- O- M+ V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G++ e>++++ h! r- y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message