From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 15 15:41:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A81516A4CE for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:41:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-1.dlr.de (smtp-1.dlr.de [195.37.61.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE44143D54 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:41:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from beagle.kn.op.dlr.de ([129.247.173.6]) by smtp-1.dlr.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:41:31 +0200 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:41:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Harti Brandt X-X-Sender: brandt_h@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de To: arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050415173711.I658@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Apr 2005 15:41:31.0622 (UTC) FILETIME=[98B9F060:01C541D1] Subject: De-orbitting ATM-HARP X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Harti Brandt List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:41:33 -0000 Hi all, not sure whether this is actually off-topic. Some time ago I asked on freebsd-atm who would have a problem when we remove HARP (netatm, hfa) from 6. I got only two or three answers which said 'go for it'. Nobody said that he would have a problem. So should we do it and when? Perhaps the best time is before 6.0. That would be in the next two weeks as I understand. While there I would also remove everything from netnatm that is not needed by NgATM. This is mainly the socket interface. I'm not aware of any application that uses it. Any thoughts on this? harti