From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Oct 1 10:41:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B0E14C30; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 10:41:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 128031C4D; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:45:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4A5381A; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:45:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:45:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: Ruslan Ermilov , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/14066: use of ssh2 as CVS_RSH breaks commiting In-Reply-To: <199910011635.MAA43945@misha.cisco.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Why don't you just say, that PRs without patches are NOT > accepted? And spare the discussions? This problem involves part > of the FreeBSD (/usr/bin/cvs) interacting with the FreeBSD port > (/usr/ports/security/ssh2). Yet, FreeBSD team refuses to aknowledge the > problem has anything to do with FreeBSD -- the PR was closed the next > day without much investigation. I like this better: CVS is vendor imported software that we didn't write nor do we maintain. SSH is a port that not only didn't we write: we don't even update or include it as part of the base system. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message