From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 10 20:31:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE411065678 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:31:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com) Received: from mail.intertainservices.com (mail.intertainservices.com [38.99.187.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BC28FC08 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.10.199] (unknown [172.16.10.199]) by mail.intertainservices.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A162756440 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:31:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C114B8C.70407@intertainservices.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:31:08 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <201006101346.59824.jhb@freebsd.org> <4C113342.7070804@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4C113342.7070804@icyb.net.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-intertainservices-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-intertainservices-MailScanner-ID: A162756440.AF245 X-intertainservices-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-intertainservices-MailScanner-From: mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: RFC: etcupdate tool in base? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:31:16 -0000 On 6/10/2010 2:47 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 10/06/2010 21:29 Eitan Adler said the following: > >> -1 unless mergemaster is replaced. > Have you tried etcupdate? > etcupdate and mergemaster have a similar function but do things in quite a > different way. While one is intended to be more interactive, the other is more > automated. They can not replace each other. > > -1 Also. How does this differ from a "mergemaster -iFU" ? That's pretty much as automated as it can get.