From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 1 02:43:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA0D16A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 02:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.romat.com (mail.romat.com [212.143.245.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954B143D3F for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 02:43:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gilad_bsd@romat.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by mail.romat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E487DEB2B1; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:43:03 +0300 (IDT) Received: from mail.romat.com ([192.168.1.10]) by localhost (mail.romat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68964-05; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:43:01 +0300 (IDT) Received: from [192.168.1.199] (unknown [192.168.1.199]) by mail.romat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BB0EB2F9; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:43:00 +0300 (IDT) From: Gilad Rom To: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.1.20040601102920.02e2faa8@popserver.sfu.ca> References: <20040601073740.GB5854@nevermind.kiev.ua> <200406011749.45666.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <6.1.0.6.1.20040601102920.02e2faa8@popserver.sfu.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Romat Telecom Message-Id: <1086082979.3116.0.camel@gilad.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 12:43:00 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at romat.com cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.10-RELEASE miniinst does not fit on 3" CD-R X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 09:43:14 -0000 On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 12:32, Colin Percival wrote: > At 09:19 01/06/2004, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > >miniinst isn't meant for small CD's, it's just meant to be smaller than the > >full disk. > > > >Would be nice to shave that 8Mb off though :) > > No it wouldn't. If we make it fit now, then we'll be struggling to > make it continue to fit for years into the future. (Just look at the > floppy disk situation.) > Much better just to accept that it doesn't fit onto a 3" CD-R and > move on. :-) > > Colin Percival > Funny. And I didn't even know they're still making 3" CD's ;) Gilad Rom