From owner-freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 10 01:05:20 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6257C1065670
	for <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 01:05:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu
	[128.206.184.213])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC878FC0C
	for <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 01:05:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213])
	by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
	q8A15HOd077004
	for <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 20:05:18 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Message-ID: <504D3CCD.2050006@missouri.edu>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 20:05:17 -0500
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
References: <5017111E.6060003@missouri.edu> <501C361D.4010807@missouri.edu>
	<20120804165555.X1231@besplex.bde.org>
	<501D51D7.1020101@missouri.edu>
	<20120805030609.R3101@besplex.bde.org>
	<501D9C36.2040207@missouri.edu>
	<20120805175106.X3574@besplex.bde.org>
	<501EC015.3000808@missouri.edu>
	<20120805191954.GA50379@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<20120807205725.GA10572@server.rulingia.com>
	<20120809025220.N4114@besplex.bde.org>
	<5027F07E.9060409@missouri.edu>
	<20120814003614.H3692@besplex.bde.org>
	<50295F5C.6010800@missouri.edu>
	<20120814072946.S5260@besplex.bde.org>
	<50297CA5.5010900@missouri.edu> <50297E43.7090309@missouri.edu>
	<20120814201105.T934@besplex.bde.org>
	<502A780B.2010106@missouri.edu>
	<20120815223631.N1751@besplex.bde.org>
	<502C0CF8.8040003@missouri.edu>
	<20120906221028.O1542@besplex.bde.org>
	<5048D00B.8010401@missouri.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5048D00B.8010401@missouri.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Complex arg-trig functions
X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions."
	<freebsd-numerics.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-numerics>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-numerics>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-numerics>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-numerics-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 01:05:20 -0000

On 09/06/2012 11:32 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

> In the days or weeks to come, I might go over all these kinds of
> conditions over again.  The paper by Hull et al, and the code used by
> boost, is written in such a way that the code for float is the same as
> the code for double.  My code was designed just enough to work, whereas
> they put more thought into it.

I am doing this right now.  The code I currently have on the web page is 
non-functional.