Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:20:14 +0200
From:      Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To:        Borodin Oleg <onborodin@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Questions about order of adding application to freebsd ports.
Message-ID:  <20170609082014.GM43031@home.opsec.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20170609095518.46bcabf4@gmail.com>
References:  <20170609092338.1dfcf932@gmail.com> <20170609072859.GK43031@home.opsec.eu> <20170609073506.GL43031@home.opsec.eu> <20170609095518.46bcabf4@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!

> > > Submit patches via bugs.freebsd.org for the two ports, and
> > > the maintainers will decide if they include them.  
> > 
> > Btw, have you submitted the patches to those perl modules upstream as well ?

> First, I sent to perl modules authors/editors from CPAN. Two or more times, to
> different addresses. In response there was silence. =(

There's a bugtracker in the perl community:

https://rt.perl.org/

It helps if you submit the patches using that bugtracker. If
you submitted them along that way, you can refer to that perl bugtracker
in the freebsd bugtracker 8-), so dass the freebsd port maintainer knows
that the upstreaming is @work.

> Or I misunderstood "perl modules upstream"?

No, you're hitting the nail!

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         3 years to go !



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170609082014.GM43031>