From owner-freebsd-net  Sat Jan  9 11:50:48 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA05017
          for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 11:50:48 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA05010
          for <net@freebsd.org>; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 11:50:45 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id SAA14727; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 18:44:28 +0100
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199901091744.SAA14727@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: DummyNet & Bridging w/ipfw Question (fwd)
To: luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it (Luigi Rizzo)
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 18:44:28 +0100 (MET)
Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199901082055.VAA12691@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> from "Luigi Rizzo" at Jan 8, 99 09:55:31 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> Also note that bridge+ipfw at the moment has some glitches because
> of a few missing ntohs() calls on the ip_off field of the IP header
> (ipfw expects some fields including this to be in host order).
> Symptoms are that packets with a DF bit set are mistaken as fragments
> and may match other rules than those intended. A fix (trivial) is
> in the works.

... and checking the commit logs i notice that this was already
fixed in -current last year by some guy called luigi...

	cheers
	luigi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message