From nobody Mon Mar 9 12:54:57 2026 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4fTxmy2LFxz6Vhv1; Mon, 09 Mar 2026 12:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R12" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fTxmx6VWrz425J; Mon, 09 Mar 2026 12:54:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1773060897; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EJg+F/b8Bp+IPXJIAgajasgkwg8Xzt9fnwKI2DnPJNM=; b=dvnXHJT75Zl/ZoGoaP4Ovr+WilUkWmUGiSY8Ebq4OzJrC85nDwLpY7/zJ7tAvFdk0OTgxA 66xvcLd+wVgfPx9a3GIEyRH3+zcfXKM7yuuTSznHJ2KzVTpdVtRb5qOsX6++YIoowGyNzy 0ytZFQsYeF1iBHi4rtnEGOSCFcI184tqCy7GHr1C7XE115dnlUFrYMQv47zKYLoIl0K7Tv K/D8/yhClDdjJxqYlmM1l8c91DBGx0WqyXjWJMrh/sf6DnM2gZh++cUROBJAqS7U+MnCKc aVKX2ZpifYAFWjPaIgN4QEd2nIayyL/V4TFxahfpo5pD0t8koYE9/iUziYhrcw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1773060897; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=weUzMY3Y62AU+8yqGdFxtJrKn9ilYtHJ0n+iR0NqJzfQyglhVGMEC/zmdI7op8CPbw77TX v3HO88XCbuhGz7RxCisXkk5N8XQtfWTZ9mrq0uPVNO2XXcxXo633vZKhAPm415ajVetnpg AiBoq/t/QEHe3CVM5v0KAMH81VFDSZFsa1HrFcZ2E4fKpbrsGtkvH0ocKLfjwDm2ZrBb7M JKKb3hw2TiNECWlOVgapqe3cLAiB7Pwol5TfzIvgZrnJdASmTIruhnw4703etnotAG2HwZ SrBG4yO5uUU4Wnh9cmnI9i5p7hJpSscWEDR9FM9tS9WT8EzpzdfmFPSyBDoLrA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1773060897; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EJg+F/b8Bp+IPXJIAgajasgkwg8Xzt9fnwKI2DnPJNM=; b=LKmvWngl4z9GgPiOB0OqWwDQl46atm5N/Lw7VOiQ6YRWEAY69J7Mykr3WTiqGn3wPolo1e IFU79h3T0fyDs3FNkbUxAufItdy2qQvfPe5rtMoq14QALDTlksObkcbSf0m7E5lnku426t OalC/2Bgbdt121G8xst0WqlbhxNsIGgCMsQgXPi3zQepBfKqWNGBNRBbnxoryNmhax/ZAr Y8vQkoSud1xRBt6VyZTDHJ2P8GURrXSsEQjdEOAQ0W+lkOp1hFxRO1NWCQ9GqyogmlpJ8G pqgC29tMqNUwL2O78dsTbhZ9EzzdHbfKWycTDElXSiXiUmX15KMtHgkOs/pcHg== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id ACEF21670; Mon, 09 Mar 2026 12:54:57 +0000 (-00) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 12:54:57 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Max Brazhnikov Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 8bd89ab595cb - main - deskutils/qownnotes: the port had been updated to version 26.3.3 Message-ID: References: <69aa7cc7.1e357.86a2325@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <2436078.THHZn3L5Ee@mercury> <2282905.PLFibm3KWW@mercury> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2282905.PLFibm3KWW@mercury> On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 02:02:56PM +0300, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 10:21:19 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 12:00:26PM +0300, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > > > Hi Alexey, > > > > commit 8bd89ab595cb9f03ab29068b1a0c08795d438781 > > > [...] > > > Is maintainer still active? > > > > No, they haven't submitted or reacted to PRs for years. > > Well, I suggest you to take maintainership or reset the port. Perhaps I will, although I don't see much value in doing so. To me, inactive maintainer is as good as ports@. > You did not answer my other question :) I don't remember if I even heard from maintainer, you may consider this as timeout or implict approval, I'm indifferent here. ./danfe