From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 07:15:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0DA16A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:15:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.liwing.de (mail.liwing.de [213.70.188.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F395243FBD for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:15:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rehsack@liwing.de) Received: (qmail 4475 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2003 15:14:59 -0000 Received: from stingray.liwing.de (HELO liwing.de) ([213.70.188.164]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.liwing.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 Nov 2003 15:14:59 -0000 Message-ID: <3FBA3773.7080806@liwing.de> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:14:59 +0000 From: Jens Rehsack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031116 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eugene References: <200311181609.26454.eugene3@web.de> In-Reply-To: <200311181609.26454.eugene3@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd-airtools update to 0.3 important for freebsd5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:15:06 -0000 Eugene wrote: >>Our bsd-airtools maintainer is seanc, not ports. >>Over to maintainer! :-) >> >>Sergey Osokin aka oZZ > > sorry, so ill look for his email now... Sergey cc'ed him :-) > (why isnt the email in the Makefile, where the maintainer is named, or did i > oversea some important file in /usr/ports/ where the emails are?) In my portsdir, I found it in /usr/ports/net/bsd-airtools/Makefile, line 15. >>Why don't you do it and submit a patch? > > im not the maintainer, and as i read i should talk to him, instead of making > patches as a "normal" user?! Yes, why not. I do it very often, when I need sth. and it's not be done by anyone else. Expect the maintainer has some other things to do, which may more important. Jens