From owner-freebsd-current Thu Sep 14 08:44:17 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id IAA13940 for current-outgoing; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 08:44:17 -0700 Received: from devnull (devnull.mpd.tandem.com [131.124.4.29]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA13934 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 08:44:13 -0700 Received: from olympus by devnull (8.6.8/8.6.6) id KAA28858; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 10:43:58 -0500 Received: by olympus (4.1/TSS2.1) id AA10094; Thu, 14 Sep 95 10:43:54 CDT From: faulkner@mpd.tandem.com (Boyd Faulkner) Message-Id: <9509141543.AA10094@olympus> Subject: Re: libforms - thumbs up or down? To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 10:43:54 -0500 (CDT) Cc: faulkner@devnull, paul@FreeBSD.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199509141202.FAA27059@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Sep 14, 95 05:02:08 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL17] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 921 Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > * From: faulkner@mpd.tandem.com (Boyd Faulkner) > > * Would it be retired to the ports? Then it would be available if > * anyone wanted it. > > Don't mean to nit-pick, but if it's broken or not used at all, it's > not welcome in ports either. The ports tree is not a retirement > home for old source. :) > > If someone really wants it, and someone (doesn't have to be the same > "someone") is committed to make sure it is going to work now and in > the future, that's fine, of course. > > Satoshi > But didn't I just see that it is used in xfmail (or was that fxmail)? All I know now is that is not used by the base system. I agree it should be fixed before it goes into ports. Boyd -- _______________________________________________________________________ Boyd Faulkner - faulkner@isd.tandem.com - http://cactus.org/~faulkner _______________________________________________________________________