From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul  4 11:04:49 2009
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61912106567A
	for <cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  4 Jul 2009 11:04:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from njm@njm.me.uk)
Received: from smtp004.apm-internet.net (smtp004.apm-internet.net
	[85.119.248.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C80E98FC19
	for <cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  4 Jul 2009 11:04:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from njm@njm.me.uk)
Received: (qmail 26515 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2009 10:38:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO titania.njm.me.uk) (86.129.202.138)
	by smtp004.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 4 Jul 2009 10:38:07 -0000
Received: from titania.njm.me.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by titania.njm.me.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n64Ac7vK023189;
	Sat, 4 Jul 2009 11:38:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@njm.me.uk)
Received: (from njm@localhost)
	by titania.njm.me.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n64Ac7vL023188;
	Sat, 4 Jul 2009 11:38:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@njm.me.uk)
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 11:38:07 +0100
From: "N.J. Mann" <njm@njm.me.uk>
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20090704103807.GA23046@titania.njm.me.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org>,
	doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
References: <200907040816.n648GQ8P029534@repoman.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200907040816.n648GQ8P029534@repoman.freebsd.org>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE
User-Agent: mutt-NJM (2009-06-23)
Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild article.sgml
X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees <cvs-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-doc>,
	<mailto:cvs-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-doc>,
	<mailto:cvs-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 11:04:49 -0000

In message <200907040816.n648GQ8P029534@repoman.freebsd.org>,
	Mark Linimon (linimon@FreeBSD.org) wrote:
> linimon     2009-07-04 08:16:26 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD doc repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild article.sgml 
>   Log:
>   Mention that we run the cluster on UTC.
>   
>   Reminded by:    droso
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.40      +6 -0      doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild/article.sgml
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild/article.sgml.diff?r1=1.39&r2=1.40
> --- doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild/article.sgml 2009/06/14 06:02:09     1.39
> +++ doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild/article.sgml 2009/07/04 08:16:26     1.40
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>        <corpauthor>The &os; Ports Management Team</corpauthor>
>      </authorgroup>
> 
> -    <pubdate>$FreeBSD: /usr/local/www/cvsroot/FreeBSD/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild/article.sgml,v 1.39 2009/06/14 06:02:09 linimon Exp $</pubdate>
> +    <pubdate>$FreeBSD: /usr/local/www/cvsroot/FreeBSD/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/portbuild/article.sgml,v 1.40 2009/07/04 08:16:26 linimon Exp $</pubdate>
> 
>      <copyright>
>        <year>2003</year>
> @@ -1399,6 +1399,12 @@ ganglia:*:102:102::0:0:User &:/usr/local
>             </listitem>
> 
>             <listitem>
> +             <para>We run the cluster on UTC:
> +               <screen>cp ../../../usr/share/zoneinfo/Etc/UCT localtime</screen>

                                                             ^^^

Curiosity has got the better of me. :-)  Is there a reason why you have
used UCT rather than UTC, which seems more logical?


Cheers,
       Nick.
--