From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 17:43:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC121065750; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:43:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00238FC15; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m8HHhL6K007809; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:43:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Alex Dupre Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:03:05 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200809151036.19674.jhb@freebsd.org> <48D03248.1040109@FreeBSD.org> <48D0A683.9020802@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <48D0A683.9020802@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809171303.05759.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:43:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.1/8270/Wed Sep 17 09:15:56 2008 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS, SUBJECT_EXCESS_QP autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Doug Barton Subject: Re: OPTIONS handling doesn't seem to work fully in dependencies anymore X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:43:50 -0000 On Wednesday 17 September 2008 02:41:07 am Alex Dupre wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > > John was referring to the problem of 'make config' not being called for > > ports being installed as dependencies of a port that has OPTIONS. > > John said (correct me if I'm wrong) that with an up-to-date system > OPTIONS doesn't correctly shows up (when the top port has OPTIONS), but > with an "old" system this worked. Reading the bsd.port.mk, the > "incriminated" CONFIG_DONE rows never changed since the introduction of > the OPTIONS support, so I think this *never* worked as expected. It used to work. I was just guessing about how it might not be working now based on reading the existing logic. I have not delved into the history to see what has changed. -- John Baldwin