From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 22 12:21:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA19997 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 22 Oct 1997 12:21:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from coal.nis.newscorp.com (mxa.newscorp.com [206.15.105.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA19916 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 1997 12:20:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@multivac.narcissus.net) Received: from multivac.narcissus.net (ts2port12.port.net [207.38.248.140]) by coal.nis.newscorp.com (News Corp SMTP GW 1.1) with SMTP id PAA10100; Wed, 22 Oct 1997 15:20:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost by multivac.narcissus.net (NX5.67e/NX3.0S) id AA00270; Wed, 22 Oct 97 15:11:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 15:11:52 -0400 (GMT-0400) From: Snob Art Genre Reply-To: benedict@echonyc.com To: "David E. Cross" Cc: J Wunsch , FreeBSD hackers Subject: Re: Possible SERIOUS bug in open()? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 22 Oct 1997, David E. Cross wrote: > I thought that O_RDRW = O_RDONLY | O_WRONLY. Tsk -- do your research. From /usr/include/fcntl.h: #define O_RDONLY 0x0000 /* open for reading only */ #define O_WRONLY 0x0001 /* open for writing only */ #define O_RDWR 0x0002 /* open for reading and writing */ Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."