From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Sep 26 01:13:16 1995
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id BAA24557
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 01:13:16 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA24543
          ; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 01:12:53 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id BAA21166; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 01:12:46 -0700
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 01:12:46 -0700
Message-Id: <199509260812.BAA21166@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: pst@shockwave.com
CC: CVS-commiters@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199509260741.AAA08033@precipice.shockwave.com> (message from Paul Traina on Tue, 26 Sep 1995 00:41:54 -0700)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Actually, I never saw a response from you,

This is really strange.  I have a copy of the mail I sent to you, I'll 
resend it right after this.

 * 					      and after playing with Apache
 * some more and checking over the features, and seeing that CERN wasn't
 * making any effort to merge the server in with the new multi-threaded WWW
 * libraries, I chose to remove the port.
 * 
 * If you think this is a bad idea, then again, I apologise.  If you think it
 * should come back, please revert it and find a new maintainer, as I will no
 * longer be available for that port.

I have no preference whether this should come back or not, I know
nothing about the www servers. :)

However, our philosophy has been pretty open, and I'd like to keep it
in there as long as someone is willing to maintain it.  (We even got a
question about it recently, right?)  More choices for the user is
never a bad thing, IMO.

I'll ask Satoshi (not me, the porter of cern_linemode) if he would
like to take this one too.

Satoshi