Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 20:42:33 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Socketd <db@traceroute.dk> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2 install hangs Message-ID: <xzpllnzwz12.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040122173229.30c17c3c@main> (db@traceroute.dk's message of "Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:32:29 %2B0100") References: <20040122131202.0cff52de@main> <xzpwu7kar7d.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040122173229.30c17c3c@main>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Socketd <db@traceroute.dk> writes: > des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote: > > how long did you wait? > Not long, 1-1=BD min I guess. That should be long enough. > > do you have anything connected to the secondary ata channel? > The cdrom-drive has one channel and the disk and the floppy share the > other. (If that's what you mean). I would put the floppy with the CD-ROM, though I don't think it would make a difference here since you also tested it with the floppy disconnected. I assume that all devices have the jumpers set correctly and in accordance with their position on the cable? If in doubt, set them all on "cable select" and take note that if a device is alone on a channel, it should be at the end of the cable. > > is anything other than ata0 and ata1 listed as using irq 14 and 15? > Nope. > > do you have "pnp os" set to "no" in youe bios? > Yep :-) OK. You might not believe this but I've actually had IRQ conflicts on fairly recent Compaq ProLiant servers - ATA controllers seem to be very uncomfortable with sharing IRQs. Could you double-check that your BIOS hasn't assigned IRQ 14 or 15 to any other devices? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpllnzwz12.fsf>