From owner-freebsd-chat  Mon May 25 18:41:43 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA21127
          for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 25 May 1998 18:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from jmb@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA21117;
          Mon, 25 May 1998 18:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jmb)
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb>
Message-Id: <199805260141.SAA21117@hub.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: vmailer and freebsd-chat
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980525183333.8158D-100000@mozart.canonware.com> from Jason Evans at "May 25, 98 06:34:44 pm"
To: jasone@canonware.com (Jason Evans)
Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 18:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: jmb@FreeBSD.ORG, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Jason Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 1998, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote:
> > done be shy to comment ;)
> 
> If you decide to make this change across all lists, please give an
> advanced warning so that I can fix my procmail regexps. =)

	so i take it that the message i just sent announcing that
	we are testing vmailer and this message were not filtered
	as desired by procmail at your site?

	can you send me the relevant procmail recipe?

	runs a little faster will only one list to deal with,
	doesnt it ;)

	(hmm...could be alternate method of dealing with the problem ;)
jmb

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message