From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jun 12 6:52:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888A137B401 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 06:52:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA16958; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:52:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Chris BeHanna Cc: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore? References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 12 Jun 2001 15:52:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Chris BeHanna writes: > A 6-hour turnaround time is pretty frigging *AWESOME*, actually. > I never cease to be amazed at the level of support there is for most > open source software, given that no formal support agreement exists > with the user base. It's simple. If we fuck up, we don't stand to lose our jobs - we stand to lose our pride, our reputation, our self-esteem and the respect of our peers. That's pretty good motivation. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message