From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Nov 18 16:18:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA08996 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 16:18:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lonegunman.xfiles.org.uk (lonegunman.xfiles.org.uk [194.200.230.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA08983 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 16:18:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from benhutch@lonegunman.xfiles.org.uk) Received: (from benhutch@localhost) by lonegunman.xfiles.org.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) id AAA19025; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 00:17:51 GMT (envelope-from benhutch) Message-ID: <19981119001751.D18407@xfiles.org.uk> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 00:17:51 +0000 From: Ben Hutchinson To: Garrett Wollman Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d, and changes to /etc/rc? References: <19981118014446.C15587@xfiles.org.uk> <19981118191628.A18022@xfiles.org.uk> <199811181928.OAA01685@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <199811181928.OAA01685@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from Garrett Wollman on Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 02:28:50PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Wouldn't that make the current scripts behave a little strangely when invoked with the stop argument? - Ben On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 02:28:50PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > There's no need for an extra directory; just get the ports maintainers > to create correct scripts. -- "Trust No One" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message